|
Ash314
|
 |
« Reply #3825 on: February 10, 2010, 05:01:49 PM » |
|
They have some comparisons with D&C. After five years of marriage (summer 86) Charles was rumoured to have had an affair with an ex flame "Kanga". After five years of marriage (fall 08) Freddy is seen with the mysteries brunette in Australia. Old Seven-Year-Hitch article on D&C |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RoyalDish.com
|
|
« Reply #3825 on: February 10, 2010, 05:01:49 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lille
|
|
« Reply #3828 on: February 11, 2010, 09:13:03 AM » |
|
....and another nipplegate  Wear a bra woman! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harley
|
|
« Reply #3829 on: February 11, 2010, 11:27:08 AM » |
|
You almost expect it to happen occationally now!  Frederik looks kinda good, though! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrie
|
|
« Reply #3830 on: February 11, 2010, 12:48:30 PM » |
|
I agree Harley, Fred was hot at one time. Fred and Mary have aged each other so quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harley
|
|
« Reply #3831 on: February 11, 2010, 03:23:39 PM » |
|
They sure have. But it's not just age! I know people of their age (and older) WAY more attractive and "well-kept" than they are! Somehow they seem drained and worn out, even if they don't look tired!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pocahontas
|
|
« Reply #3832 on: February 13, 2010, 08:29:10 AM » |
|
Can't find the plastic surgery thread so I'll post this here.
I believe the pic with the pink sweater was taken in 2003 during a trip to Ireland.
Mary's eyes are shaped more like they are today: wonky right eye, left eye much bigger than the other. But her upper lids are noticeably "hooded", her eyes are level across, and almond shaped.
The pics from the engagement (Oct 2004) show Mary's new "perky" eyes: symmetric, doe-shaped, outer edges pointing slightly up. No amount of weight loss will make these changes.
What is odd is how her eyes are returning to their original shape. I guess as we age, everything starts to sag - even the things that have been "pinned" up once already.
As for the nose, I think she had one nose job to narrow her nose before 2003, and another one before the engagement to reduce the bulb at the tip a little bit more.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Little_star
Most Exalted Member
Reputation: 1543
 Offline
 Niue
Posts: 18693
Mary Who?
|
|
« Reply #3833 on: February 13, 2010, 03:37:08 PM » |
|
Thanks for the photos pocahontas, imo Mary has definitely had her eyes done.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“The truth is not simply what you think it is; it is also the circumstances in which it is said, and to whom, why, and how it is said.”
|
|
|
|
|
HRH Miss Scarlett
Mini Member
Reputation: 24
Offline
 United States
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #3834 on: February 13, 2010, 03:49:24 PM » |
|
Wow, thanks for the pictures. Mary definitely had her eyes done between the Ireland trip and her engagement announcement. There is a hugely noticeable difference in the overall shape of the eyes and the eyelid hoods. She had very almond-shaped eyes with large hoods over them. At her engagement, you are so right in noticing that Mary's eyes are much less hooded, and their shape is inherently different.
But you are also right in noting that Mary's eyes are starting to droop back to their natural shape...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harley
|
|
« Reply #3835 on: February 13, 2010, 03:51:36 PM » |
|
It really seems to be the case, yes.  I do think, though, that she was prettier before! I'd even almost call her pretty back then. Almost! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thrilla
|
|
« Reply #3836 on: February 13, 2010, 04:21:06 PM » |
|
Almost is right. She was never ugly, but far from pretty because she does not have pretty features. There was something appealing, I dare say slightly attractive about her in her pre-Fred days, though. I'm convinced she had work done on her eyes. I'm just wondering how it was financed and why/how Fred could agree to marry a woman who had that kind of surgery at such a young age - pure vanity, not even trying to turn back the clock to something she once had, like some older women do to regain their looks. I respect him less and less, the more I understand about the woman he chose to marry.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pocahontas
|
|
« Reply #3837 on: February 13, 2010, 08:29:44 PM » |
|
Nose job for sure!
Here are Mary's graduation photo (early 20's) and Starmakers photo from 2000.
Clearly her nose narrowed and the bulb reduced between 2000 and 2003.
I'm guessing she wore cheap clothes and shared a flat with multiple roommates to make ends meet since she had to pay for the nose job. I'll bet Daddy Donaldson helped pay too. After all, his daughter had a shot at becoming a princess. What luck! The Donaldsons bet the farm.
The eye job probably happened in early 2004. By then Fred was paying all of Mary's bills (her rent, clothes, vacations). What's another $5000 for an eye job? Maybe Mary didn't even tell him about it ahead of time. She charged it to his Black Amex and had it done while he was out of town.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
royal observer
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3838 on: February 13, 2010, 08:39:49 PM » |
|
Whoever did her eye job for her engagement did a great job IMO. The eyes looked larger and lifted yet the results still looked natural.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RoyalDish.com
|
|
« Reply #3838 on: February 13, 2010, 08:39:49 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lille
|
|
« Reply #3839 on: February 13, 2010, 08:44:41 PM » |
|
Look at the boobs on that!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
